Obama Presser Just a Ruse to Head Off FOX Benghazi Survivor Threat Story

Did the White House schedule Obama's latest press conference just to try to "get out in front' of the breaking story on FOX News of White House threatening survivors and State Department whistle blowers to remain silent? 

Obama knows the question is coming from FOX (or he's stupid) and so his plan was to ask Ed Henry of FOX, then pretend to "never heard of it" and "I'll get back to you."  Really?  It's the lead story on all FOX TV all day.  It's the headline on FOXnews.com and The Drudge Report for 24 hours and you never heard of it?  No one told you that question might come up?  Seriously?

Ask yourself these questions:

Why does a President who avoids press conferences like the plague suddenly schedule one without any opening statement or announcements?  He's never done that.  Obama always scolds us and then asks for more spending.  Not this time.  Nothing.  Just straight to questions.  Strange!

Why was his very first question to Ed Henry, the FOX reporter?  That never happens.  Why now?  Obama knew FOX News had been running that lead story of threats and cover up over and over for 24 hours on all it's daily programs and its Web site.  Drudge also ran it as their headline.  FOX had extensive interviews all day with the attorney representing the still anonymous 3 State Department personnel.  The allegations are very serious, and could lead to obstruction of justice charges at the highest levels of the White House and a Watergate style cover up if they prove to be true.  FOX also repeatedly ran the interview with the special ops agent, who was in the loop at the time, and who just came forward to say we could indeed have gotten forces in to prevent the second attack but were told not to and all the talk otherwise is a lie.

Media Still Saying Older Brother Died in Shoot Out But Offical Police Report Than Brother Ran Him Down

Why does the AP still try to say that the older brother "died in a police shoot out" or alternately, skewing the reports, "died after a police shoot out" when the official reports say that the younger brother ran him down intentionally with the stolen SUV:

The police chief, Edward Deveau, describes how cops nearly apprehended the older suspect, and were placing handcuffs on him in the middle of the street Thursday night, when the younger suspect came at officers in a carjacked SUV. The cops were able "to dive out of the way," and the younger suspect then continued to drive directly over his brother and dragging him through the street. That's how the older suspect died, according to the police chief.

The interview with the police chief took place April 20 on CNN.

The London Daily Mail gives this account from the same CNN Interview:

'Now, my closest officer is five to 10 feet away, and they're exchanging gunfire between them. And he runs out of ammunition -- the bad guy -- and so one of my police officers comes off the side and tackles him in the street.'

He was in the process of being handcuffed by two or three officers when his younger brother, 19-year-old Dzhokhar, jumped behind the wheel of a black SUV the two had allegedly carjacked earlier and barreled toward the group.

Officers who were restraining Tamerlan Tsarnaev got out of the way of the speeding vehicle, which ended up driving over the wounded suspect, the police chief told CNN.

According to Deveau, the 19-year-old suspect dragged his sibling’s body a short distance down the street and drove off. He later ditched the SUV and escaped on foot.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2312207/Did-younger-bomber-KILL-brother-running-Police-chiefs-dramatic-account-firefight-reveals-suspect-alive-hit-siblings-car.html#ixzz2RnBlKX6q

Boston Terror Bombers Islamic Extremists

From their Facebook pages and other online sources both of these terrorists were radical Islamist and called themselves Muslims.




Will you hear much about the role of their religion in the mainstream press?  Probably not.  They will all say how we needed to have understood these poor boys. 

And as always the left will look for "sociological" causes--you know, it's the fault of all of us, not them.  They were just the weak point in society so they are not really responsible.

Probably had too much gluten as children.  Or maybe once one of them got bullied by someone who used a pressure cooker.  But, goodness no, clearly it can't be what these two boys state is their cause, to serve Allah.

The liberal solution will be to fund more sensitivity training for all of us, at taxpayers expense--and take your guns.  Because remember: it's all your fault.

As Rev. Jeremiah Wright would say, "American, your chickens are coming home to roost."

Your Kids Belong to the Collective, Says MSNBC & Prof

Backed by a multi-million dollar campaign that MSNBC is funding, political science professor Melissa Harris-Perry says your children are not yours – they are owned by the community. She says public education has failed because we have not allowed the state to confiscate more of our money.

So reports Kurt Nimmo on Infowars.com (April 6, 2013)

“We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families,” says the professor of political science at Tulane University, where she is founding director of the Anna Julia Cooper Project on Gender, Race, and Politics in the South. Kids belong to whole communities, she insists, and once we realize this we’ll make “better investments” in government indoctrination of children.

Nimmo observes that Melissa Harris-Perry is regurgitating the Obama “you didn’t build that” meme.  Only this time it's your kids.  They aren't yours.  They belong to the state, to the collecive. So education has failed because we haven't spent enough money on it.

Harris-Perry urges us to “break through” the “private idea” that individuals own themselves.  We belong to "the community," which is of course the center piece of socialism and communism.  Everything belongs to the collective--like a swarm of bees or a mound of ants.  And who is the queen bee?  Read on.

It seems incomprehensible that a multinational corporation like MSNBC would embrace communism. In fact, as Gary Allen noted, it is quite natural.

“If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of superrich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all,” he wrote. “Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite.”

http://www.infowars.com/your-kids-belong-to-the-collective/